%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : TOP024+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:53:51 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.53s 2.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 141 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 19 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 166 ( 61 ~; 51 |; 29 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 20 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 0 sgn 34 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t2_tsp_2,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
=> v1_tops_1(X2,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tsp_2) ).
fof(d5_tsp_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
<=> ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
& v1_tsp_1(X2,X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tsp_2) ).
fof(t61_tex_4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+405.ax',t61_tex_4) ).
fof(d2_tops_3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( l1_pre_topc(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tops_1(X2,X1)
<=> k6_pre_topc(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+370.ax',d2_tops_3) ).
fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( r1_tarski(X2,X1)
& r1_tarski(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',d10_xboole_0) ).
fof(t3_subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
<=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+9.ax',t3_subset) ).
fof(dt_k6_pre_topc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
& l1_pre_topc(X1) )
=> m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+206.ax',dt_k6_pre_topc) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
=> v1_tops_1(X2,X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_tsp_2]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
<=> ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
& v1_tsp_1(X2,X1) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d5_tsp_2]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
=> v1_tops_1(X2,X1) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( l1_pre_topc(X1)
& v2_pre_topc(X1)
& ~ v3_struct_0(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
=> r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t61_tex_4]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X154,X155] :
( ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X154)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X154)
| v3_struct_0(X154)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X155,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X154)))
| v1_tsp_2(X155,X154)
| k3_tex_4(X154,X155) != u1_struct_0(X154)
| ~ v1_tsp_1(X155,X154) )
& ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X154)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X154)
| v3_struct_0(X154)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X155,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X154)))
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X155,X154)
| k3_tex_4(X154,X155) = u1_struct_0(X154) )
& ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X154)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X154)
| v3_struct_0(X154)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X155,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X154)))
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X155,X154)
| v1_tsp_1(X155,X154) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v1_tops_1(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
& l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
& v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
& ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1734,X1735] :
( r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1734,X1735),k6_pre_topc(X1734,X1735))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1735,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1734)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1734)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1734)
| v3_struct_0(X1734) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X79,X80] :
( ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X79)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X80,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X79)))
| v1_tops_1(X80,X79)
| k6_pre_topc(X79,X80) != u1_struct_0(X79) )
& ( ~ l1_pre_topc(X79)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X80,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X79)))
| k6_pre_topc(X79,X80) = u1_struct_0(X79)
| ~ v1_tops_1(X80,X79) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tops_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X505,X506] :
( ( X505 = X506
| ~ r1_tarski(X506,X505)
| ~ r1_tarski(X505,X506) )
& ( X505 != X506
| r1_tarski(X506,X505) )
& ( X505 != X506
| r1_tarski(X505,X506) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| r1_tarski(k3_tex_4(X1,X2),k6_pre_topc(X1,X2))
| v3_struct_0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_tops_1(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| k6_pre_topc(X1,X2) != u1_struct_0(X1)
| v1_tops_1(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1)
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0) != u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X527,X528] :
( ( m1_subset_1(X527,k1_zfmisc_1(X528))
| ~ r1_tarski(X527,X528) )
& ( r1_tarski(X527,X528)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X527,k1_zfmisc_1(X528)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ r1_tarski(k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0),u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X474,X475] :
( m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X474,X475),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X474)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X475,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X474)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X474) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_pre_topc])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(esk1_0,esk2_0),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| m1_subset_1(k6_pre_topc(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : TOP024+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 12:43:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.53/2.83 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.53/2.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.53/2.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 3292841 completed with status 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Result found by G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y
% 9.53/2.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.53/2.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.53/2.83 % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_R02_F100_L20000
% 9.53/2.83 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 9.53/2.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3292842 completed with status 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 9.53/2.83 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMLLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.53/2.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.53/2.83 % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_R02_F100_L20000
% 9.53/2.83 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 9.53/2.83 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 9.53/2.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 9.53/2.83 % Preprocessing time : 0.072 s
% 9.53/2.83
% 9.53/2.83 % Proof found!
% 9.53/2.83 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.53/2.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.53/2.83 % Parsed axioms : 34382
% 9.53/2.83 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 33791
% 9.53/2.83 % Initial clauses : 1437
% 9.53/2.83 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 45
% 9.53/2.83 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1392
% 9.53/2.83 % Processed clauses : 7224
% 9.53/2.83 % ...of these trivial : 40
% 9.53/2.83 % ...subsumed : 5028
% 9.53/2.83 % ...remaining for further processing : 2156
% 9.53/2.83 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 44
% 9.53/2.83 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Backward-subsumed : 39
% 9.53/2.83 % Backward-rewritten : 47
% 9.53/2.83 % Generated clauses : 28430
% 9.53/2.83 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22669
% 9.53/2.83 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 80
% 9.53/2.83 % Paramodulations : 28374
% 9.53/2.83 % Factorizations : 2
% 9.53/2.83 % NegExts : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Equation resolutions : 54
% 9.53/2.83 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Total rewrite steps : 8117
% 9.53/2.83 % ...of those cached : 7564
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.53/2.83 % Current number of processed clauses : 2046
% 9.53/2.83 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 228
% 9.53/2.83 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Negative unit clauses : 183
% 9.53/2.83 % Non-unit-clauses : 1635
% 9.53/2.83 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16276
% 9.53/2.83 % ...number of literals in the above : 61312
% 9.53/2.83 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Current number of archived clauses : 86
% 9.53/2.83 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 999380
% 9.53/2.83 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 310590
% 9.53/2.83 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3893
% 9.53/2.83 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47490
% 9.53/2.83 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % BW rewrite match attempts : 189
% 9.53/2.83 % BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 9.53/2.83 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.53/2.83 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1435859
% 9.53/2.83 % Search garbage collected termcells : 363691
% 9.53/2.83
% 9.53/2.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.53/2.83 % User time : 1.328 s
% 9.53/2.83 % System time : 0.202 s
% 9.53/2.83 % Total time : 1.531 s
% 9.53/2.83 % Maximum resident set size: 69336 pages
% 9.53/2.83
% 9.53/2.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.53/2.83 % User time : 2.064 s
% 9.53/2.83 % System time : 0.248 s
% 9.53/2.83 % Total time : 2.312 s
% 9.53/2.83 % Maximum resident set size: 56576 pages
% 9.53/2.83 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------