↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : TOP025+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:56:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.36s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  153 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  176 (  62   ~;  57   |;  32   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   1 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t62_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t62_tex_4) ).

fof(t3_tsp_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
              & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
              & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_tsp_2) ).

fof(t58_tex_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t58_tex_4) ).

fof(d5_tsp_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
          <=> ( v1_tsp_1(X2,X1)
              & k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tsp_2) ).

fof(t5_tex_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
     => ( v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
      <=> X2 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_tex_2) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    <=> r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t62_tex_4]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
          & v2_pre_topc(X1)
          & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
           => ~ ( ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
                  | v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) )
                & v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
                & v1_tex_2(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_tsp_2])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
           => k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t58_tex_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X194,X195] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X194)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X194)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X194)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X195,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X194)))
      | ~ v4_pre_topc(X195,X194)
      | k3_tex_4(X194,X195) = X195 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & l1_pre_topc(esk1_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0)))
    & ( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
      | v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X187,X188] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X187)
      | ~ v2_pre_topc(X187)
      | ~ l1_pre_topc(X187)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X188,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X187)))
      | ~ v3_pre_topc(X188,X187)
      | k3_tex_4(X187,X188) = X188 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_pre_topc(X1)
        & l1_pre_topc(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
         => ( v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
          <=> ( v1_tsp_1(X2,X1)
              & k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d5_tsp_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X144,X145] :
      ( ( v1_tsp_1(X145,X144)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X145,X144)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X145,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X144)))
        | v3_struct_0(X144)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X144)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X144) )
      & ( k3_tex_4(X144,X145) = u1_struct_0(X144)
        | ~ v1_tsp_2(X145,X144)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X145,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X144)))
        | v3_struct_0(X144)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X144)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X144) )
      & ( ~ v1_tsp_1(X145,X144)
        | k3_tex_4(X144,X145) != u1_struct_0(X144)
        | v1_tsp_2(X145,X144)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X145,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X144)))
        | v3_struct_0(X144)
        | ~ v2_pre_topc(X144)
        | ~ l1_pre_topc(X144) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
    | ~ v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    | v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X192,X193] :
      ( ( ~ v1_tex_2(X193,k1_zfmisc_1(X192))
        | X193 != X192
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X193,k1_zfmisc_1(X192)) )
      & ( X193 = X192
        | v1_tex_2(X193,k1_zfmisc_1(X192))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X193,k1_zfmisc_1(X192)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_tex_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    u1_struct_0(esk1_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_15]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X182,X183] :
      ( ( ~ m1_subset_1(X182,k1_zfmisc_1(X183))
        | r1_tarski(X182,X183) )
      & ( ~ r1_tarski(X182,X183)
        | m1_subset_1(X182,k1_zfmisc_1(X183)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X177] : r1_tarski(X177,X177),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : TOP025+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 09:54:31 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.36  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.36/1.76  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.36/1.76  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.36/1.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.36/1.76  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------