%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : TOP025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.75s 2.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 19 unt; 8 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 75 ( 12 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_143,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_143) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_139,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_139) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_142,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_142) ).
cnf(i_0_136,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_136) ).
cnf(i_0_133,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_133) ).
cnf(i_0_66,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_66) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hota6suw/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(c_0_157,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v4_pre_topc(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_143 ).
cnf(c_0_158,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
l1_pre_topc(esk1_0),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
v2_pre_topc(esk1_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = X2
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v3_pre_topc(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_139 ).
cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
| ~ v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_157,c_0_158]),c_0_159]),c_0_160])]),c_0_161]) ).
cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
( v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0)
| v4_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
( k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0
| ~ v3_pre_topc(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_158]),c_0_159]),c_0_160])]),c_0_161]) ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_142 ).
cnf(c_0_167,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
i_0_136 ).
cnf(c_0_168,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
i_0_133 ).
cnf(c_0_169,plain,
( k3_tex_4(X1,X2) = u1_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
| ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
i_0_66 ).
cnf(c_0_170,negated_conjecture,
k3_tex_4(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_163,c_0_164]),c_0_165]) ).
cnf(c_0_171,negated_conjecture,
v1_tsp_2(esk2_0,esk1_0),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_172,plain,
( ~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_166]) ).
cnf(c_0_173,plain,
m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_167,c_0_168]) ).
cnf(c_0_174,negated_conjecture,
v1_tex_2(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
esk2_0 = u1_struct_0(esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_169,c_0_158]),c_0_170]),c_0_159]),c_0_160]),c_0_171])]),c_0_161]) ).
cnf(c_0_176,plain,
~ v1_tex_2(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_172,c_0_173])]) ).
cnf(c_0_177,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]),c_0_176]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : TOP025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 04:17:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.75/2.38 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.75/2.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.75/2.38 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.75/2.38 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2q
% 7.75/2.38 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNp.
% 7.75/2.38 #
% 7.75/2.38 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.75/2.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.75/2.38
% 7.75/2.38 # Proof found!
% 7.75/2.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.75/2.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.75/2.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.75/2.38
% 7.75/2.38 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.75/2.38 # User time : 0.022 s
% 7.75/2.38 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.75/2.38 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.75/2.38 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.75/2.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------