↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : TOP027+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 21:24:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 16.67s 6.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  15 unt;   3 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   6 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6223,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,X3)) = X3
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X3,X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6223) ).

cnf(i_0_1272,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_1272) ).

cnf(i_0_5519,plain,
    ( v3_pre_topc(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_5519) ).

cnf(i_0_6777,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk886_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6777) ).

cnf(i_0_6779,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk885_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6779) ).

cnf(i_0_6778,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk885_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6778) ).

cnf(i_0_6776,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk886_0,esk885_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6776) ).

cnf(i_0_6780,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk885_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6780) ).

cnf(i_0_6774,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk885_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0),esk886_0,k1_tops_1(esk885_0,esk887_0))) != k1_tops_1(esk885_0,esk887_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6774) ).

cnf(i_0_6775,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk887_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_dqc5uu5/lgb.p',i_0_6775) ).

cnf(c_0_6791,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,X3)) = X3
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v3_pre_topc(X3,X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_6223 ).

cnf(c_0_6792,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_1272 ).

cnf(c_0_6793,plain,
    ( v3_pre_topc(k1_tops_1(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_5519 ).

cnf(c_0_6794,plain,
    ( k3_tex_4(X1,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(X1),X2,k1_tops_1(X1,X3))) = k1_tops_1(X1,X3)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ l1_pre_topc(X1)
    | ~ v1_tsp_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6791,c_0_6792]),c_0_6793]) ).

cnf(c_0_6795,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk886_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0))),
    i_0_6777 ).

cnf(c_0_6796,negated_conjecture,
    v2_pre_topc(esk885_0),
    i_0_6779 ).

cnf(c_0_6797,negated_conjecture,
    l1_pre_topc(esk885_0),
    i_0_6778 ).

cnf(c_0_6798,negated_conjecture,
    v1_tsp_2(esk886_0,esk885_0),
    i_0_6776 ).

cnf(c_0_6799,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk885_0),
    i_0_6780 ).

cnf(c_0_6800,negated_conjecture,
    k3_tex_4(esk885_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0),esk886_0,k1_tops_1(esk885_0,esk887_0))) != k1_tops_1(esk885_0,esk887_0),
    i_0_6774 ).

cnf(c_0_6801,negated_conjecture,
    ( k3_tex_4(esk885_0,k5_subset_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0),esk886_0,k1_tops_1(esk885_0,X1))) = k1_tops_1(esk885_0,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6794,c_0_6795]),c_0_6796]),c_0_6797]),c_0_6798])]),c_0_6799]) ).

cnf(c_0_6802,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk887_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk885_0))),
    i_0_6775 ).

cnf(c_0_6803,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6800,c_0_6801]),c_0_6802])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : TOP027+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun May 29 08:30:01 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.39/1.66  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/1.66  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 1.39/1.66  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 1.39/1.66  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 16.67/6.76  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 16.67/6.76  # No SInE strategy applied
% 16.67/6.76  # Trying AutoSched0 for 148 seconds
% 16.67/6.76  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 16.67/6.76  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 16.67/6.76  #
% 16.67/6.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 16.67/6.76  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 16.67/6.76  
% 16.67/6.76  # Proof found!
% 16.67/6.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 16.67/6.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 16.67/6.76  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 16.67/6.76  
% 16.67/6.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 16.67/6.76  # User time                : 0.476 s
% 16.67/6.76  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 16.67/6.76  # Total time               : 0.498 s
% 16.67/6.76  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 16.67/6.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------